How Twitter is like a Native American Talking Circle

by Laura on April 15, 2010 · 3 comments

What if you were to approach Twitter as if it were a Native American Talking Circle? In the Talking Circle format, you value every voice equally. You listen respectfully. Everyone can contribute. You share your soul, learn from others, and make decisions. You build ideas and relationships in a collaborative environment.

Twitter Talking Circle

The Talking Circle uses a simple format that loosely models the synapse and spark of your brain. Ideas bounce from one part of the circle to another. The Talking Circle is often leaderless, but may deploy the use of a talking stick or talking feather (or hashtag!) to help facilitate respect for those who are speaking. Modern teams may toss balls or Frisbees as fun, concrete tools to help keep order while inspiring ideas.

And because Talking Circles and Twitter encourage talk with no apparent purpose other than the act of talking and sharing, they are often dismissed as a valuable business format. But discussions in Talking Circles and Twitter can be oddly transforming. Open discussions can generate new ideas. They release creativity. Open dialogs using a Talking Circle format can foster community, trust, and respect.

And I have to admit, tossing around ideas on Twitter and in Talking Circles can be fun. I also enjoy the element of play — when we toss about a brightly colored Koosh ball, we not only keep order and focus, but we add a bit of levity to a creative meeting. When we banter on Twitter, we not only generate more ideas, but we simultaneously build relationships.

In modern business, new-fangled concepts like open innovation and crowdsourcing are gaining momentum and respect. However, these new buzzwords seem to be based on old-fashioned notions like Talking Circles and Coffee Klatches. (Note the growing popularity of ‘doing business’ in wireless coffee houses.)

What if we ran more meetings and presentations in this time-honored format? Open and leaderless, allowing meaningful ideas to emerge organically? Would we improve collaboration, trust, and creativity? Or would meetings degenerate into endless meetings for the sake of meetings?

How are you using old-school open collaboration formats like Talking Circles in modern environments? How is it working for you?

{ 3 comments… read them below or add one }

1 Maureen Rice April 15, 2010 at 12:56 pm

Great parrallel – with the talking circle…but then there’s the peace pipe. That would be tough to pass on virally. I just hope we never completely bypass face-to-face interaction.

2 Warwick John Fahy May 14, 2010 at 11:49 pm

Laura
Nice metaphor. As a professional facilitator I have used the Talking Circle and World Cafe format to improve group dynamics. I wonder if twitter would be better to generate ideas, while the Talking Circle is more of a reflective process, allowing people to be heard and share within a defined group.

Warwick John Fahy
Author, The One Minute Presenter
Certified Professional Facilitator, IAF-CPF

3 Talking Circle July 5, 2011 at 7:36 pm

I agree that Twitter loosley models a talking circle. A Native American Talking Circle is a ceremony and has nothing to do with twitter. It is a circle of human beings sitting next to each other in ceremony. There is far more to the true Native American Talking Circle than the general public could comprehen, unless they have had opportunities to experience what was passed down from many generations.

I know, as I am a Native American Talking Circle Facilitator by right of the Grandfather (Great Spirit).

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: